Categories Multiple Myeloma

Random survival forest to predict transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma outcome …

Random survival forest to predict transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma outcome …

  • 1.

    Cavo M, Terpos E, Nanni C, Moreau P, Lentzsch S, Zweegman S, et al. Role of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma and other plasma cell dyscrasias: a consensus statement by the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:e206–17.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Moreau P, Attal M, Caillot D, Macro M, Karlin L, Garderet L, et al. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging and [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography at diagnosis and before maintenance therapy in symptomatic patients with multiple myeloma included in the IFM/DFCI 2009 trial: results of the IMAJEM Study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:2911–8.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Bartel TB, Haessler J, Brown TL, Shaughnessy JD Jr, van Rhee F, Anaissie E, et al. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2009;114:2068–76.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Zamagni E, Patriarca F, Nanni C, Zannetti B, Englaro E, Pezzi A, et al. Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET-CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation. Blood. 2011;118:5989–95.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Usmani SZ, Mitchell A, Waheed S, Crowley J, Hoering A, Petty N, et al. Prognostic implications of serial 18-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography in multiple myeloma treated with total therapy 3. Blood. 2013;121:1819–23.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    McDonald JE, Kessler MM, Gardner MW, Buros AF, Ntambi JA, Waheed S, et al. Assessment of total lesion glycolysis by (18) F FDG PET/CT significantly improves prognostic value of GEP and ISS in myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:1981–7.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Fonti R, Larobina M, Del Vecchio S, De Luca S, Fabbricini R, Catalano L, et al. Metabolic tumor volume assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT for the prediction of outcome in patients with multiple myeloma. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1829–35.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Terao T, Machida Y, Tsushima T, Miura D, Narita K, Kitadate A, et al. Pre-treatment metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis are superior to conventional positron-emission tomography/computed tomography variables for outcome prediction in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in clinical practice. Br J Haematol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.16633

  • 9.

    Fonti R, Pellegrino S, Catalano L, Pane F, Del Vecchio S, Pace L. Visual and volumetric parameters by 18F-FDG-PET/CT: a head to head comparison for the prediction of outcome in patients with multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2020;99:127–35.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Rasche L, Chavan SS, Stephens OW, Patel PH, Tytarenko R, Ashby C, et al. Spatial genomic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma revealed by multi-region sequencing. Nat Commun. 2017;8:268.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Yip SSF, Aerts HJWL. Applications and limitations of radiomics. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:R150–66.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Hatt M, Tixier F, Pierce L, Kinahan PE, Cheze Le Rest C, Visvikis D. Characterization of PET/CT images using texture analysis: the past, the present…any future? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:151–65.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Ishwaran H, Kogalur U, Blackstone E, Lauer M. Random survival forest. Ann Appl Stat. 2008;2:841–60.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Morvan L, Carlier T, Jamet B, Bailly C, Bodet-Milin C, Moreau P, et al. Leveraging RSF and PET images for prognosis of multiple myeloma at diagnosis. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020;15:129–39.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Schaefer A, Vermandel M, Baillet C, Dewalle-Vignion AS, Modzelewski R, Vera P, et al. Impact of consensus contours from multiple PET segmentation methods on the accuracy of functional volume delineation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:911–24.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Bailly C, Bodet-Milin C, Couespel S, Necib H, Kraeber-Bodéré F, Ansquer C, et al. Revisiting the robustness of PET-based textural features in the context of multi-centric trials. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0159984.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Desseroit MC, Tixier F, Weber WA, Siegel BA, Cheze Le Rest C, Visvikis D, et al. Reliability of PET/CT shape and heterogeneity features in functional and morphologic components of non–small cell lung cancer tumors: a repeatability analysis in a prospective multicenter cohort. J Nucl Med. 2016;58:406–11.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Van Velden FHP, Kramer GM, Frings V, Nissen IA, Mulder ER, de Langen AJ, et al. Repeatability of radiomic features in non-small-cell lung cancer [18F] FDG-PET/CT studies: impact of reconstruction and delineation. Mol Imaging Biol. 2016;18:788–95.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Zwanenburg A, Vallières M, Abdalah MA, Aerts HJWL, Andrearczyk V, Apte A, et al. The image biomarker standardization initiative: standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping. Radiology. 2020;295:328–38.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C, Hosny A, Aucoin N, Narayan V, et al. Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res. 2017;77:e104–e7.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Hao H, Zhou Z, Li S, Maquilan G, Folkert MR, Iyengar P, et al. Shell feature: a new radiomics descriptor for predicting distant failure after radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer and cervix cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:095007.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Lucia F, Visvikis D, Vallières M, Desseroit MC, Miranda O, Robin P, et al. External validation of a combined PET and MRI radiomics model for prediction of recurrence in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:864–77.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Stein CK, Qu P, Epstein J, Buros A, Rosenthal A, Crowley J, et al. Removing batch effects from purified plasma cell gene expression microarrays with modified ComBat. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:63.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Orlhac F, Soussan M, Maisonobe JA, Garcia CA, Vanderlinden B, Buvat I. Tumor texture analysis in 18F-FDG PET: Relationships between texture parameters, histogram indices, standardized uptake values, metabolic volumes, and total lesion glycolysis. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:414–22.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med. 2012;24:69–71.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Dietrich S, Floegel A, Troll M, Kühn T, Rathmann W, Peters A, et al. Random survival forest in practice: a method for modelling complex metabolomics data in time to event analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45:1406–20.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Wang H, Gang L. A selective review on random survival forests for high dimensional data. Quant Biosci. 2017;36:85–96.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, Peerlings J, de Jong EEC, van Timmeren J, et al. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:749–62.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Attal M, Lauwers-Cances V, Hulin C, Leleu X, Caillot D, Escoffre M, et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone with transplantation for myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1311–20.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Cavo M, Gay F, Beksac M, Pantani L, Petrucci MT, Dimopoulos MA, et al. Autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation versus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone, with or without bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone consolidation therapy, and lenalidomide maintenance for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (EMN02/HO95): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7:e456–68.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Aljama MA, Sidiqi MH, Buadi FK, Lacy MQ, Gertz MA, Dispenzieri A, et al. Utility and prognostic value of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol. 2018;93:1518–23.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Da-ano R, Masson I, Lucia F, Doré M, Robin P, Alfieri J, et al. Performance comparison of modified ComBat for harmonization of radiomic features for multicenter studies. Sci Rep. 2020;10:10248.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Da-ano R, Visvikis D, Hatt M. Harmonization strategies for multicenter radiomics investigations. Phys Med Biol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aba798.

  • 34.

    Zhou Y, McArdle JJ. Rationale and applications of survival tree and survival ensemble methods. Psychometrika. 2015;80:811–33.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Gregorutti B, Michel B, Saint-Pierre P. Correlation and variable importance in random forests. Stat Comput. 2017;3:659–78.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Moreau P, Zweegman S, Perrot A, Hulin C, Caillot D, Facon T, et al. Evaluation of the prognostic value of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) at diagnosis and follow-up in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (TE NDMM) patients treated in the phase 3 CASSIOPEIA Study: results of the CASSIOPET Companion Study. Oral communication. ASH annual congress 2019.

  • 37.

    Moreau P, Attal M, Hulin C, Arnulf B, Belhadj K, Benboubker L, et al. Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (CASSIOPEIA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;394:29–38.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Published at Fri, 02 Oct 2020 23:05:33 +0000

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *